House Republicans are provoking a fight with the powerful National Association of Realtors by drafting legislation that would curtail the number of loans backed by the Federal Housing Administration, the main source of mortgage money for first-time home buyers.
GOP lawmakers have made scaling back government support of the housing market a key priority. However, they are encountering resistance from Realtors and many Democrats, who believe such support is essential to keep the moribund housing market from sinking further.
Home buyers who take out FHA loans pay insurance premiums to the government. That money is used to pay claims to lenders when borrowers default. Currently, homeowners are able to take out FHA-backed loans with a minimum down payment of 3.5% as long as they have a relatively healthy credit score.
A draft bill to be discussed at a House subcommittee hearing Wednesday would raise the minimum down payment to 5% in an effort to require the agency to make safer loans and stabilize the agency’s finances, which deteriorated in the wake of the housing bust.
Rep. Judy Biggert (R., Ill.), said in a statement Monday that Republicans aim to redesign government mortgage programs to strike “the right balance for taxpayers and home buyers.” The legislation also would make a significant cut to the maximum size of loans backed by FHA in many parts of the country.
The maximum size of loans that can be backed by FHA in expensive parts of the country is already scheduled to go to $625,500 from $729,750 on Oct. 1. However, in areas where home prices are more modest, that limit is scheduled to fall as low as $271,050.
The GOP bill would allow those limits to fall even more—to 125% of a county’s median home price.
In some parts of the country, the GOP bill would result in far-lower loan limits than those that are scheduled to go into effect in October, according to data compiled by the Realtors. For example, the limit would be nearly $440,000 lower in Accomack County, Va. and about $351,000 lower in Baltimore.
“While we support reforms to strengthen the program, changes should not be made at consumers’ expense by drastically impacting the affordability and availability of mortgage capital,” said Ron Phipps, NAR’s president, in a prepared statement.
Brian Chappelle, a mortgage industry consultant, said such a move would also be bad for FHA’s fiscal health because it would eliminate loans on more expensive properties, which tend to have lower rates of default.
The bill, however, could be good for private mortgage insurers such as PMI Group Inc. and MGIC Investment Corp., which compete with FHA, but could hurt the housing market in the short term, said Jaret Seiberg, a financial policy analyst at MF Global’s Washington Research Group.
“It would make it even harder for first-time buyers to enter the housing market regardless of their incomes or earnings potential,” Mr. Seiberg wrote in a note to clients.
Loans backed by the FHA made up nearly 18% of new loans made in the first quarter, according to trade publication Inside Mortgage Finance.
The FHA doesn’t make loans but rather insures them against default. The agency’s volume grew rapidly in the wake of the mortgage bust, sparking warnings that the agency would need government funding for the first time in its history.
The Obama administration hiked fees and tightened lending standards, and an audit released last year showed the agency’s finances have started to stabilize.
Popular posts from this blog
April Market Reports: 3 Important Takeaways to Share With Your Clients May 30, 2019 OVER 1,000 MANHATTAN HOMES ENTERED CONTRACT IN APRIL. According to the StreetEasy April 2019 Market Reports, the New York City sales market may be strengthening. This news comes after months of weakening prices across the city, rising share of price cuts and growing days on market. Read on for three takeaways from our most recent report that will offer you and your seller encouraging signs. Nearly 1,200 Homes Entered Contract in Manhattan This April The context: The number of pending sales in Manhattan rose by 26.6% year-over-year to 1,193 in April. That marks an annual increase of more than 250 and the most homes to enter contract since 2015. Upper Manhattan saw a lot of contact activity with pending sales doubling to 132 from 66 the year before. Washington Heights and Central Harlem led the charge with 53 and 29 homes entering contract, up by 104% and 53%, respectively. The takeaway: M
Manhattan’s 2016 Narrative – 5 Main Themes to Know 2016, the year of normalization… After five straight years of progressive reflation in Manhattan residential real estate (2010-2015), buyers finally saw the leverage pendulum swing their way. Of course, just how much leverage a buyer gained still heavily depends on the price point. What’s happening at the high end is drastically different than what’s happening at the lower end. Lets discuss before the firms Q4 market reports are released. Here are the 5 themes you need to know about Manhattan’s 2016: Read more...
Legal Line Question of the Week - REBNY Transfer Taxes and Grossed up Consideration I represent the prospective purchaser of a new construction condominium unit. In speaking with the sales office for the sponsor, I was informed that my purchaser is responsible for paying both the New York City and New York State transfer taxes. I thought that the obligation to pay transfer taxes was the r esponsibility of the seller. Can you please explain? Generally, when real property (or a co-op apartment) is sold in New York City, the seller is responsible for paying both the New York State and New York City transfer taxes. In residential real estate transactions where the purchase price is greater than $500,000, the New York City transfer tax equals 1.425% of the purchase price (and where the purchase price is $500,000 or below, the New York City transfer tax is 1% of the purchase price). The New York State transfer tax is .4% of the purchase price. New Yo